![]() ![]() ![]() By updating to a recent iOS version, you also benefit from the most updated security patches, so it is always recommended to update iOS. What’s New Version History Version 2.2319.9 Bug fixes and performance improvements. Unfortunately, WhatsApp will no longer be compatible with iPhone 5 and iPhone 5C since iOS 12 is not available for these devices, but… who is using iPhone 5/5C nowadays? Removing the support for certain iOS versions is needed to support the latest features implemented on WhatsApp. 3.2 3.8K Ratings Free Screenshots With WhatsApp on the desktop, you can seamlessly sync all of your chats to your computer so that you can chat on whatever device is most convenient for you. If you’re using iOS 10 or iOS 11, you need to update to iOS 12 in order to continue using WhatsApp: it means you can still continue using WhatsApp on iPhone 5S, iPhone 6, and iPhone 6S, but you need to update your iOS version. WhatsApp Web and Desktop are computer-based extensions of the WhatsApp account on your phone. This is also confirmed by reading an article posted on the official WhatsApp Help Center, that mentions iOS 12 and newer versions as supported and recommended operating systems. Point your phone camera at the QR code on your iPad screen. ![]() This screenshot reveals that WhatsApp will stop supporting iOS 10 and iOS 11 after October 24, 2022. Open WhatsApp on your phone, tap Settings in the top right, then WhatsApp Web. ![]()
0 Comments
![]() ![]() Indeed, Marshall Faulk was one of the NFL’s. He’s going to need some strong voices on the selection committee arguing his case, but there is certainly a case to be made. The man to whom many football people compare Jamaal Charles was enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 2011 as a first-ballot selection. Charles set an NFL record for backs with 5.4 yards per carry and was a two-time first-team All-Pro. The clock hasn’t started to send Charles to Canton just yet, but when it does don’t expect him to be a first-ballot guy. Jamaal Charles officially retired on Wednesday, signing a one-day contract with the Chiefs. If anything, he’s matched the production of some of those in the Hall of Fame with shorter careers, like Earl Campbell and Terrell Davis. If you look at his career statistics you’ll find that most of his greatness spanned just five seasons (2009-2010, 2012-2014), while the others were with abbreviated, mostly because of injuries. ![]() There have been plenty of arguments against Charles’ case because his career spans 11 seasons and others achieved similar career yardage in less time. ![]() Injury history and career length won’t hurt Charles’ argument. He has plenty of accolades as a four-time Pro Bowler and a two-time All-Pro, but he doesn’t have the glory of a Super Bowl or MVP season to ride on. The Chiefs’ lack of playoff success during Charles’ career hurts his case significantly. First of all, there’s a logjam of running backs waiting to get into the Hall of Fame. Charles has a lot working against him, though. He’s got more than Jim Brown, Joe Perry, Gale Sayers and Barry Sanders. Yards per carry is certainly a good argument for Charles. It just goes to show you exactly how dominant he was during his prime. Every time I touched the ball, I averaged six yards a carry basically.” “That tells you what type of player I was,” Charles said. Despite unproductive appearances in those two games, and a pedestrian 14 games the season prior for the Broncos, Charles is second to only Marion Motley in NFL career yards per carry with 5.4. Charles has yet to retire from the NFL, and he played two games in 2018 for the Jacksonville Jaguars. In an interview with TMZ Sports, Charles spoke about his career and whether or not he’d achieved enough to be considered for the Hall of Fame. Does former Chiefs running back Jamaal Charles belong in Canton among the NFL’s greats? He certainly thinks so. ![]() ![]() ![]() Replacement of watch battery does not guarantee function or water resistance. There is no guarantee for moisture, bands, crystals or minor repairs. Not responsible for the loss of stones due to worn prongs and settings when cleaning.Īll watch overhauls are guaranteed for 12 months. We recommend this be done every 6 months. We will clean your jewelry (ultrasonic and steam) and check the settings free of charge. Not responsible for items left beyond 90 days. ![]() This store shall not be held responsible for the following: identification or condition of jewelry at time of receipt: altered, treated, or enhanced diamonds or coloured stones and/or pieces that are unmarked or marked incorrectly. Liability for any damage or loss of items shall be limited to accrual cost to repair or replace the item(s). In such a case a restocking fee of 15% of the original invoice will be charged, with the remaining balance to be issued as a store credit only. At our discretion only, layaways may be cancelled in the event of special circumstances. If no satisfactory arrangements have been made for full payment beyond the end of this period, the item(s) will be returned to stock, and all payments will be forfeited. ![]() Articles placed on layaway will be held for a period of 90 days from the date of this receipt. Layaway payments are required at least every 30 days. Full payment upon receipt of custom work will denote the client’s complete satisfaction. Every effort will be made to accurately manufacture or produce the item(s) so ordered. Custom jewelry is non-refundable and requires a 50% non-refundable deposit before the work begins. A special order includes any jewelry, gemstone or watch that has to be ordered to accommodate the client’s request for an alternate style, size, metal or colour that is not available in stock.Ĭustom designed jewelry involves metals, gems and labour furnished for a specific client. Special orders are not refundable or exchangeable. Refund will be issued to the payment method used on the original purchase.Īll special orders require a 50% deposit and are non-cancellable.
![]() You'd be surprised how good a movie like this can be, despite the fact that "nothing really happens." Here are some of the best slice-of-life movies that are really worth watching! 15. They're wandering, hazy, witty, and totally watchable. They immerse you in their worlds, not through flashy visuals but a realistic presence. ![]() There wasn't really a scriptmore like a few guiding plot points that were organically developed with the actors. So-called "slice-of-life" movies are exactly what they sound like: intricate and intimate glimpses into a character's life. Trailer for Boyhood (2014) Boyhood is literally a slice-of-life movie, as it was filmed across 12 years and captured the cast growing up in real-time. These are the types of films you just have to watch to understand. of or pertaining to a naturalistic, unembellished representation of real life: a play with slice-of-life dialogue. The phrase slice of life was actually first used in place of a French phrase tranche de vie. No flashy explosions, no mysterious murders. To write slice of life you need to be very familiar with your characters, since the story centers around their lives. A work in a genre (of theater, cinema, literature, manga, etc.) that presents day-to-day happenings with no clear central plot and takes place in a world that. There are actually lots of great movies that don't have strong hooks or premises. Slice of life is literally a story that uses the mundane: the daily life and experiences of the characters, as the center of the story. Slice-of-life definition, of, relating to, or being a naturalistic, unembellished representation of real life: a play with slice-of-life dialogue. ![]() You'll know what I mean after you see it!" You, probably well, they just go around and do stuff and talk about stuff. Have you ever watched a movie that was so good that you just had to recommend it to everyone? But when they ask you what the movie is about, you're at a loss for words? Noun edit slice of life ( plural slices of life ) A work in a genre (of theater, cinema, literature, manga, etc. ![]() ![]() ![]() But that’s the way it is, as inevitable as internationalism. It’s a thoroughly deplorable state of affairs. Many if not most US American classicists, to their shame and to their and the world's loss (if they did but know it), speak no other language. At international meetings even Germans and Italians (and even some French, wonder of wonders) are as likely as not to give their presentations in English, and other-national journals with articles in their native language are fading fast. ![]() Chinese scholarship on what we will have to stop calling the Classics, now burgeoning, is mostly in English I suppose that may change in the future, so maybe that's a language to learn (for other reasons too!) but I can testify it's not easy for someone with acquaintance only with I-E languages! The big four Western languages increasingly dominate journals and international conferences increasingly require papers to be in one of those four and English increasingly dominates over all the rest. Russian scholarship is increasingly in English, at least as far as Greek literature goes and even linguistics. I hope I don't sound too harsh, I just want to temper some of the unabated enthusiasm fledgling Classicists hear from day one about research languages.Īfter German and Italian, most definitely French, with everything else (Spanish, modern Greek) far far behind. I will say though that learning these other languages often comes at a reasonably low cost: If you have Latin it really is intuitive to pick up the Romance languages, I can't claim that Italian cost me any real effort per esempio. The more you read, the more obvious your needs will become so don't worry about it. As time goes on the amount of new stuff that you MUST read lessens immensely. The highly influential older works will already have spread their influence across several languages. Yes I think you do have to learn modern languages - I think at least French, German and Italian - but it's not going to be as transformative as you might think. I've known one or two people who picked it up as a research language. I don't know too much about Russian - I'm rightly suspicious of their scholarship - but they produce a lot of work on Scythians, the Black sea, Iranian-Greek interactions and so on and forth. Greek scholarship often gets castigated (tbf, often rightly so) but you'd be hard pressed doing archaeology without it and, yes, there is a decent amount of byzantine stuff. The amount of good work in Italian is increasing, especially the kind of traditional scholarship coming out of Pisa on textual criticism, philology and manuscripts etc. There's a lot of stuff on ancient religions, mythology, structuralism etc in French that can be rescued from the inanities of literary theory for example. There's this mindset in Classics - well largely in the UK - that one needs to be 's not always helpful. I had to learn French, German and Italian even as an undergraduate and often the main reason I'd use the former two languages were a) consulting some great reference work or b) arguing with a recent book or journal. ![]() Honestly.the gap between English and the other languages is considerably larger than most are aware of or willing to admit. Does anyone have anything to say for it? I can recall chancing on some interesting (and illegible) stuff every once in a while, and made the mental note that it wouldn't be terribly useless to learn it (my German is decent enough, certainly enough to read scholarship, so it wouldn't be completely out of the blue), but there's the circular argument that no one else around here uses it, so we don't have bibliography, so I don't know what exists, and so don't even know where I should look etc. I started to write this thinking of Dutch in particular. And then what? Where on the ladder, if at all, would you put French and Modern Greek, Russian and Dutch, etc? Would you say there other languages more tied to specific fields of study? (From the list above, only thing that comes to mind would be Modern Greek for Byzantine studies.) There's the usual culprits, German, especially for Greek studies, Italian, especially for Roman & Latin etc. What modern languages should be a priority if you're doing Classics? This started as a comment on jeidsath's post in the word accent thread. ![]() |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |